GABAB Receptor Chemistry and Pharmacology: Agonists, Antagonists, and Allosteric Modulators.

The GABAB receptors are metabotropic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that mediate the actions of the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). In the CNS, GABA plays an important role in behavior, learning and memory, cognition, and stress. GABA is also located throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and is involved in the autonomic control of the intestine and esophageal reflex. Consequently, dysregulated GABAB receptor signaling is associated with neurological, mental health, and gastrointestinal disorders; hence, these receptors have been identified as key therapeutic targets and are the focus of multiple drug discovery efforts for indications such as muscle spasticity disorders, schizophrenia, pain, addiction, and gastroesophageal reflex disease (GERD). Numerous agonists, antagonists, and allosteric modulators of the GABAB receptor have been described; however, Lioresal® (Baclofen; ß-(4-chlorophenyl)-γ-aminobutyric acid) is the only FDA-approved drug that selectively targets GABAB receptors in clinical use; undesirable side effects, such as sedation, muscle weakness, fatigue, cognitive deficits, seizures, tolerance and potential for abuse, limit their therapeutic use. Here, we review GABAB receptor chemistry and pharmacology, presenting orthosteric agonists, antagonists, and positive and negative allosteric modulators, and highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting GABAB receptor modulation for the treatment of various CNS and peripheral disorders.

Molecular mechanisms of metabotropic GABAB receptor function.

Metabotropic γ-aminobutyric acid G protein-coupled receptors (GABAB) represent one of the two main types of inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the brain. These receptors act both pre- and postsynaptically by modulating the transmission of neuronal signals and are involved in a range of neurological diseases, from alcohol addiction to epilepsy. A series of recent cryo-EM studies revealed critical details of the activation mechanism of GABAB Structures are now available for the receptor bound to ligands with different modes of action, including antagonists, agonists, and positive allosteric modulators, and captured in different conformational states from the inactive apo to the fully active state bound to a G protein. These discoveries provide comprehensive insights into the activation of the GABAB receptor, which not only broaden our understanding of its structure, pharmacology, and physiological effects but also will ultimately facilitate the discovery of new therapeutic drugs and neuromodulators.

Structural basis of GABAB receptor-Gi protein coupling.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have central roles in intercellular communication1,2. Structural studies have revealed how GPCRs can activate G proteins. However, whether this mechanism is conserved among all classes of GPCR remains unknown. Here we report the structure of the class-C heterodimeric GABAB receptor, which is activated by the inhibitory transmitter GABA, in its active form complexed with Gi1 protein. We found that a single G protein interacts with the GB2 subunit of the GABAB receptor at a site that mainly involves intracellular loop 2 on the side of the transmembrane domain. This is in contrast to the G protein binding in a central cavity, as has been observed with other classes of GPCR. This binding mode results from the active form of the transmembrane domain of this GABAB receptor being different from that of other GPCRs, as it shows no outside movement of transmembrane helix 6. Our work also provides details of the inter- and intra-subunit changes that link agonist binding to G-protein activation in this heterodimeric complex.

Structural Basis for Activation of the Heterodimeric GABAB Receptor.

The neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) activates the metabotropic GABAB receptor to generate slow, prolonged inhibitory signals that regulate the neural circuitry. The GABAB receptor is an obligate heterodimeric G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) comprised of GBR1 and GBR2 subunits, each with extracellular, seven-helix transmembrane (7TM), and coiled-coil domains. To understand how GABA-driven conformational changes in the extracellular domain are transmitted to the 7TM domain during signal transduction, we determined cryo-electron microscopy (EM) structures of GABAB in two different states: an antagonist-bound inactive state, and an active state in which both the GABA agonist and a positive allosteric modulator (PAM) are bound. In the inactive state, the TM3 and TM5 helices in the two 7TM domains engage in cholesterol-mediated as well as direct interactions, resulting in an open conformation. GABA binding forces the extracellular domains of GBR1 and GBR2 into a compact form, relocating the linkers that connect the extracellular and 7TM domains closer to each other. The movement of the linker along with the associated extracellular loop 2 of the 7TM domain reorients the two 7TM domains and creates a new interface with the TM5, TM6 and TM7 helices in a closed conformation. PAM binding to the interface between the TM6 and TM6 helices stabilizes the active 7TM domain conformation. The relayed structural rearrangement results in significant conformational changes in the TM helices, as well as intracellular loop 3 in GBR2, which may promote the binding and activation of the Gi/o proteins.

The GABAB Receptor-Structure, Ligand Binding and Drug Development.

The γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type B receptor (GABAB-R) belongs to class C of the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Together with the GABAA receptor, the receptor mediates the neurotransmission of GABA, the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS). In recent decades, the receptor has been extensively studied with the intention being to understand pathophysiological roles, structural mechanisms and develop drugs. The dysfunction of the receptor is linked to a broad variety of disorders, including anxiety, depression, alcohol addiction, memory and cancer. Despite extensive efforts, few compounds are known to target the receptor, and only the agonist baclofen is approved for clinical use. The receptor is a mandatory heterodimer of the GABAB1 and GABAB2 subunits, and each subunit is composed of an extracellular Venus Flytrap domain (VFT) and a transmembrane domain of seven α-helices (7TM domain). In this review, we briefly present the existing knowledge about the receptor structure, activation and compounds targeting the receptor, emphasizing the role of the receptor in previous and future drug design and discovery efforts.

Structures of metabotropic GABAB receptor.

Stimulation of the metabotropic GABAB receptor by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) results in prolonged inhibition of neurotransmission, which is central to brain physiology1. GABAB belongs to family C of the G-protein-coupled receptors, which operate as dimers to transform synaptic neurotransmitter signals into a cellular response through the binding and activation of heterotrimeric G proteins2,3. However, GABAB is unique in its function as an obligate heterodimer in which agonist binding and G-protein activation take place on distinct subunits4,5. Here we present cryo-electron microscopy structures of heterodimeric and homodimeric full-length GABAB receptors. Complemented by cellular signalling assays and atomistic simulations, these structures reveal that extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) of GABAB has an essential role in relaying structural transitions by ordering the linker that connects the extracellular ligand-binding domain to the transmembrane region. Furthermore, the ECL2 of each of the subunits of GABAB caps and interacts with the hydrophilic head of a phospholipid that occupies the extracellular half of the transmembrane domain, thereby providing a potentially crucial link between ligand binding and the receptor core that engages G proteins. These results provide a starting framework through which to decipher the mechanistic modes of signal transduction mediated by GABAB dimers, and have important implications for rational drug design that targets these receptors.

Structural basis of the activation of a metabotropic GABA receptor.

Metabotropic γ-aminobutyric acid receptors (GABAB) are involved in the modulation of synaptic responses in the central nervous system and have been implicated in neuropsychological conditions that range from addiction to psychosis1. GABAB belongs to class C of the G-protein-coupled receptors, and its functional entity comprises an obligate heterodimer that is composed of the GB1 and GB2 subunits2. Each subunit possesses an extracellular Venus flytrap domain, which is connected to a canonical seven-transmembrane domain. Here we present four cryo-electron microscopy structures of the human full-length GB1-GB2 heterodimer: one structure of its inactive apo state, two intermediate agonist-bound forms and an active form in which the heterodimer is bound to an agonist and a positive allosteric modulator. The structures reveal substantial differences, which shed light on the complex motions that underlie the unique activation mechanism of GABAB. Our results show that agonist binding leads to the closure of the Venus flytrap domain of GB1, triggering a series of transitions, first rearranging and bringing the two transmembrane domains into close contact along transmembrane helix 6 and ultimately inducing conformational rearrangements in the GB2 transmembrane domain via a lever-like mechanism to initiate downstream signalling. This active state is stabilized by a positive allosteric modulator binding at the transmembrane dimerization interface.

Structure of human GABAB receptor in an inactive state.

The human GABAB receptor-a member of the class C family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)-mediates inhibitory neurotransmission and has been implicated in epilepsy, pain and addiction1. A unique GPCR that is known to require heterodimerization for function2-6, the GABAB receptor has two subunits, GABAB1 and GABAB2, that are structurally homologous but perform distinct and complementary functions. GABAB1 recognizes orthosteric ligands7,8, while GABAB2 couples with G proteins9-14. Each subunit is characterized by an extracellular Venus flytrap (VFT) module, a descending peptide linker, a seven-helix transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic tail15. Although the VFT heterodimer structure has been resolved16, the structure of the full-length receptor and its transmembrane signalling mechanism remain unknown. Here we present a near full-length structure of the GABAB receptor, captured in an inactive state by cryo-electron microscopy. Our structure reveals several ligands that preassociate with the receptor, including two large endogenous phospholipids that are embedded within the transmembrane domains to maintain receptor integrity and modulate receptor function. We also identify a previously unknown heterodimer interface between transmembrane helices 3 and 5 of both subunits, which serves as a signature of the inactive conformation. A unique 'intersubunit latch' within this transmembrane interface maintains the inactive state, and its disruption leads to constitutive receptor activity.

Cryo-EM structures of inactive and active GABAB receptor.

Metabotropic GABAB G protein-coupled receptor functions as a mandatory heterodimer of GB1 and GB2 subunits and mediates inhibitory neurotransmission in the central nervous system. Each subunit is composed of the extracellular Venus flytrap (VFT) domain and transmembrane (TM) domain. Here we present cryo-EM structures of full-length human heterodimeric GABAB receptor in the antagonist-bound inactive state and in the active state complexed with an agonist and a positive allosteric modulator in the presence of Gi1 protein at a resolution range of 2.8-3.0 Å. Our structures reveal that agonist binding stabilizes the closure of GB1 VFT, which in turn triggers a rearrangement of TM interfaces between the two subunits from TM3-TM5/TM3-TM5 in the inactive state to TM6/TM6 in the active state and finally induces the opening of intracellular loop 3 and synergistic shifting of TM3, 4 and 5 helices in GB2 TM domain to accommodate the α5-helix of Gi1. We also observed that the positive allosteric modulator anchors at the dimeric interface of TM domains. These results provide a structural framework for understanding class C GPCR activation and a rational template for allosteric modulator design targeting the dimeric interface of GABAB receptor.

The organizing principle of GABAB receptor complexes: Physiological and pharmacological implications.

GABAB receptors (GBRs), the G protein-coupled receptors for the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), regulate synaptic transmission at most synapses in the brain. Proteomic approaches revealed that native GBR complexes assemble from an inventory of ~30 proteins that provide a molecular basis for the functional diversity observed with these receptors. Studies with reconstituted GBR complexes in heterologous cells and complementary knockout studies have allowed to identify cellular and physiological functions for obligate and several non-obligate receptor components. It emerges that modular association of receptor components in space and time generates a variety of multiprotein receptor complexes with different localizations, kinetic properties and effector channels. This article summarizes current knowledge on the organizing principle of GBR complexes. We further discuss unanticipated receptor functions, links to disease and opportunities for drug discovery arising from the identification of novel receptor components.

Exploring the Binding Mechanism of GABAB Receptor Agonists and Antagonists through in Silico Simulations.

GABAB is a G protein-coupled receptor that functions as a constitutive heterodimer composed of the GABAB1a/b and GABAB2 subunits. It mediates slow and prolonged inhibitory neurotransmission in the nervous system, representing an attractive target for the treatment of various disorders. However, the molecular mechanism of the GABAB receptor is not thoroughly understood. Therefore, a better description of the binding of existing agonists and antagonists to this receptor is crucial to improve our knowledge about G protein-coupled receptor structure as well as for helping the development of new potent and more selective therapeutic agents. In this work, we used the recent X-ray cocrystallization data of agonists (GABA and baclofen) and antagonists (2-hydroxysaclofen, SCH50911, and CGP54626) bound to the GABAB orthosteric site together with quantum biochemistry and the molecular fractionation with conjugate caps (MFCC) scheme to describe the individual contribution of each amino acid residue involved in the GABAB-ligand interaction, pointing out differences and similarities among the compounds. Our quantum biochemical computational results show that the total binding energy of the ligands to the GABAB ligand pocket, with radius varying from 2.0 to 9.0 Å, is well-correlated with the experimental binding affinity. In addition, we found that the binding site is very similar for agonists or antagonists, showing small differences in the importance of the most significant amino acids. Finally, we predict the energetic relevance of the regions of the five ligands as well as the influence of each protein lobe on GABAB-ligand binding. These results provide important new information on the binding mechanism of the GABAB receptor and should facilitate the development of new chemicals targeting this receptor.

Control of Protein Conformation and Orientation on Graphene.

Graphene-based biosensors have attracted considerable attention due to their advantages of label-free detection and high sensitivity. Many such biosensors utilize noncovalent van der Waals force to attach proteins onto graphene surface while preserving graphene's high conductivity. Maintaining the protein structure without denaturation/substantial conformational change and controlling proper protein orientation on the graphene surface are critical for biosensing applications of these biosensors fabricated with proteins on graphene. Based on the knowledge we obtained from our previous experimental study and computer modeling of amino acid residual level interactions between graphene and peptides, here we systemically redesigned an important protein for better conformational stability and desirable orientation on graphene. In this paper, immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody-binding domain of protein G (protein GB1) was studied to demonstrate how we can preserve the protein native structure and control the protein orientation on graphene surface by redesigning protein mutants. Various experimental tools including sum frequency generation vibrational spectroscopy, attenuated total refection-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, and circular dichroism spectroscopy were used to study the protein GB1 structure on graphene, supplemented by molecular dynamics simulations. By carefully designing the protein GB1 mutant, we can avoid strong unfavorable interactions between protein and graphene to preserve protein conformation and to enable the protein to adopt a preferred orientation. The methodology developed in this study is general and can be applied to study different proteins on graphene and beyond. With the knowledge obtained from this research, one could apply this method to optimize protein function on surfaces (e.g., to enhance biosensor sensitivity).

Targeting the γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type B (GABAB) Receptor Complex: Development of Inhibitors Targeting the K+ Channel Tetramerization Domain (KCTD) Containing Proteins/GABAB Receptor Protein-Protein Interaction.

Targeting multiprotein receptor complexes, rather than receptors directly, is a promising concept in drug discovery. This is particularly relevant to the GABAB receptor complex, which plays a prominent role in many brain functions and diseases. Here, we provide the first studies targeting a key protein-protein interaction of the GABAB receptor complex-the interaction with KCTD proteins. By employing the µSPOT technology, we first defined the GABAB receptor-binding epitope mediating the KCTD interaction. Subsequently, we developed a highly potent peptide-based inhibitor that interferes with the KCTD/GABAB receptor complex and efficiently isolates endogenous KCTD proteins from mouse brain lysates. X-ray crystallography and SEC-MALS revealed inhibitor induced oligomerization of KCTD16 into a distinct hexameric structure. Thus, we provide a template for modulating the GABAB receptor complex, revealing a fundamentally novel approach for targeting GABAB receptor-associated neuropsychiatric disorders.

In silico structure-based design of GABAB receptor agonists using a combination of docking and QSAR.

The study of γ-aminobutyric acid B receptor (GABAB ) activation is of great interest for several brain disorders. The search of new GABAB receptor agonists has been carried out by many research groups. As a result, Baclofen has become the prototypical GABAB receptor agonist. However, several attempts have been made to modify its structure to generate derivatives with improved activity. In this work, we carried out a theoretical and computational study for a wide range of GABAB receptor agonists reported in the literature. Molecular docking and QSAR techniques were combined by using the interaction energies of the agonists with the key residues of GABAB receptor, as molecular descriptors for the QSAR construction. The resulting mathematical model suggests that the activity of GABAB receptor agonists is influenced by three factors: their shape and molecular size (PW5 and PJI2), their constitutional features (ELUMO and T(N…O)) and the energy interaction with GABAB receptor (ETRP278 ). This model was validated by the QUIK, REDUNDANCY and OVERFITTING rules, and its predicted ability was tasted by the QLOO , QASYM , R02 and rm2 rules. Finally, six new compounds are proposed (35-40) with high potential to be used as GABAB receptor agonists.

Structural basis for auxiliary subunit KCTD16 regulation of the GABAB receptor.

Metabotropic GABAB receptors mediate a significant fraction of inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain. Native GABAB receptor complexes contain the principal subunits GABAB1 and GABAB2, which form an obligate heterodimer, and auxiliary subunits, known as potassium channel tetramerization domain-containing proteins (KCTDs). KCTDs interact with GABAB receptors and modify the kinetics of GABAB receptor signaling. Little is known about the molecular mechanism governing the direct association and functional coupling of GABAB receptors with these auxiliary proteins. Here, we describe the high-resolution structure of the KCTD16 oligomerization domain in complex with part of the GABAB2 receptor. A single GABAB2 C-terminal peptide is bound to the interior of an open pentamer formed by the oligomerization domain of five KCTD16 subunits. Mutation of specific amino acids identified in the structure of the GABAB2-KCTD16 interface disrupted both the biochemical association and functional modulation of GABAB receptors and G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channel (GIRK) channels. These interfacial residues are conserved among KCTDs, suggesting a common mode of KCTD interaction with GABAB receptors. Defining the binding interface of GABAB receptor and KCTD reveals a potential regulatory site for modulating GABAB-receptor function in the brain.

In Silico Methods for the Discovery of Orthosteric GABAB Receptor Compounds.

The GABAB receptor (GABAB-R) is a heterodimeric class C G protein-coupled receptor comprised of the GABAB1a/b and GABAB2 subunits. The endogenous orthosteric agonist γ-amino-butyric acid (GABA) binds within the extracellular Venus flytrap (VFT) domain of the GABAB1a/b subunit. The receptor is associated with numerous neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders including learning and memory deficits, depression and anxiety, addiction and epilepsy, and is an interesting target for new drug development. Ligand- and structure-based virtual screening (VS) are used to identify hits in preclinical drug discovery. In the present study, we have evaluated classical ligand-based in silico methods, fingerprinting and pharmacophore mapping and structure-based in silico methods, structure-based pharmacophores, docking and scoring, and linear interaction approximation (LIA) for their aptitude to identify orthosteric GABAB-R compounds. Our results show that the limited number of active compounds and their high structural similarity complicate the use of ligand-based methods. However, by combining ligand-based methods with different structure-based methods active compounds were identified in front of DUDE-E decoys and the number of false positives was reduced, indicating that novel orthosteric GABAB-R compounds may be identified by a combination of ligand-based and structure-based in silico methods.

Structural basis for KCTD-mediated rapid desensitization of GABAB signalling.

The GABAB (γ-aminobutyric acid type B) receptor is one of the principal inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the brain, and it signals through heterotrimeric G proteins to activate a variety of effectors, including G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels (GIRKs)1,2. GABAB-receptor signalling is tightly regulated by auxiliary subunits called KCTDs, which control the kinetics of GIRK activation and desensitization3-5. However, the mechanistic basis for KCTD modulation of GABAB signalling remains incompletely understood. Here, using a combination of X-ray crystallography, electron microscopy, and functional and biochemical experiments, we reveal the molecular details of KCTD binding to both GABAB receptors and G-protein ßγ subunits. KCTDs associate with the receptor by forming an asymmetric pentameric ring around a region of the receptor carboxy-terminal tail, while a second KCTD domain, H1, engages in a symmetric interaction with five copies of Gßγ in which the G-protein subunits also interact directly with one another. We further show that KCTD binding to Gßγ is highly cooperative, defining a model in which KCTD proteins cooperatively strip G proteins from GIRK channels to induce rapid desensitization following receptor activation. These results provide a framework for understanding the molecular basis for the precise temporal control of GABAB signalling by KCTD proteins.

Argon reduces the pulmonary vascular tone in rats and humans by GABA-receptor activation.

Argon exerts neuroprotection. Thus, it might improve patients' neurological outcome after cerebral disorders or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, limited data are available concerning its effect on pulmonary vessel and airways. We used rat isolated perfused lungs (IPL) and precision-cut lung slices (PCLS) of rats and humans to assess this topic. IPL: Airway and perfusion parameters, oedema formation and the pulmonary capillary pressure (Pcap) were measured and the precapillary and postcapillary resistance (Rpost) was calculated. In IPLs and PCLS, the pulmonary vessel tone was enhanced with ET-1 or remained unchanged. IPLs were ventilated and PCLS were gassed with argon-mixture or room-air. IPL: Argon reduced the ET-1-induced increase of Pcap, Rpost and oedema formation (p < 0.05). PCLS (rat): Argon relaxed naïve pulmonary arteries (PAs) (p < 0.05). PCLS (rat/human): Argon attenuated the ET-1-induced contraction in PAs (p < 0.05). Inhibition of GABAB-receptors abolished argon-induced relaxation (p < 0.05) in naïve or ET-1-pre-contracted PAs; whereas inhibition of GABAA-receptors only affected ET-1-pre-contracted PAs (p < 0.01). GABAA/B-receptor agonists attenuated ET-1-induced contraction in PAs and baclofen (GABAB-agonist) even in pulmonary veins (p < 0.001). PLCS (rat): Argon did not affect the airways. Finally, argon decreases the pulmonary vessel tone by activation of GABA-receptors. Hence, argon might be applicable in patients with pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure.

Amino acid substitutions in the human homomeric ß3 GABAA receptor that enable activation by GABA.

GABAA receptors (GABAARs) are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels that mediate synaptic inhibition throughout the central nervous system. The α1ß2γ2 receptor is the major subtype in the brain; GABA binds at the ß2(+)α1(-) interface. The structure of the homomeric ß3 GABAAR, which is not activated by GABA, has been solved. Recently, four additional heteromeric structures were reported, highlighting key residues required for agonist binding. Here, we used a protein engineering method, taking advantage of knowledge of the key binding residues, to create a ß3(+)α1(-) heteromeric interface in the homomeric human ß3 GABAAR that enables GABA-mediated activation. Substitutions were made in the complementary side of the orthosteric binding site in loop D (Y87F and Q89R), loop E (G152T), and loop G (N66D and A70T). The Q89R and G152T combination enabled low-potency activation by GABA and potentiation by propofol but impaired direct activation by higher propofol concentrations. At higher concentrations, GABA inhibited gating of ß3 GABAAR variants containing Y87F, Q89R, and G152T. Reversion of Phe87 to tyrosine abolished GABA's inhibitory effect and partially recovered direct activation by propofol. This tyrosine is conserved in homomeric GABAARs and in the Erwinia chrysanthemi ligand-gated ion channel and may be essential for the absence of an inhibitory effect of GABA on homomeric channels. This work demonstrated that only two substitutions, Q89R and G152T, in ß3 GABAAR are sufficient to reconstitute GABA-mediated activation and suggests that Tyr87 prevents inhibitory effects of GABA.

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel 2,3-disubstituted Benzofuran Analogues of GABA as Neurotropic Agents.

BACKGROUND: Benzofurans are heterocyclic compounds with neurotropic activity. Some have been developed for the treatment of acute and degenerative neuronal injuries. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the in silico binding of some promising benzofurans on the GABA receptors, and the in vivo neurotropic activity of benzofuran analogues (BZF 6-10) of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on a seizure model. METHODS: The ligands with the best physicochemical attributes were docked on two GABA receptors (the alpha-1 subunit of GABAA-R and GBR1 subunit of GABAB-R). Selected benzofuran derivatives were synthesized by a multistep procedure and characterized. To examine the neurotropic effects, mice were pretreated with different concentrations of the compounds prior to PTZ- or 4- AP-induced seizures. We assessed acute toxicity, motor behavior, and the effects on seizures. RESULTS: The tested ligands that complied with Lipinski's rule of five were tested in silico with GABAA-R (ΔG = -5.51 to -5.84 kcal/mol) at the allosteric site for benzodiazepines. They bound to a similar cluster of residues as the reference compound (gaboxadol, ΔG = -5.51 kcal/mol). Synthesis was achieved with good overall yields (42-9.7%). Two compounds were selected for biological tests (BZF-7 and rac-BZF-10) on a mouse model of seizures, induced by pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) or 4-aminopyridine (4-AP). PTZ-induced seizures are associated with GABA receptors, and those 4-AP-induced with the blockage of the delayed rectifier-type potassium channel, which promotes the release of the NMDA-sensitive glutamatergic ionotropic receptor and other neurotransmitters. The biological assays demonstrated that BZF-7 and rac-BZF-10 do not protect against seizures. Indeed, BZF-7 increased the number of PTZ-induced seizures and decreased latency time. The 4-AP model apparently showed a potentiation of seizure effects after administration of the BZF-analogues, evidenced by the incidence and severity of the seizures and reduced latency time. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the test compounds are GABAergic antagonists with stimulatory activity on the CNS.